Stage Production of The $30,000 Bequest
From: Larry Howe
To: Mark Twain Forum
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 8:50 AM
I had the pleasure of attending a performance of "The $30,000 Bequest" on
Saturday at the New American Theatre in Rockford, IL. The run will include
at least one more weekend of performances, and I highly recommend it to anyone
within a few hours of Rockford.
This production is adapted and directed by Alexander Gelman. What's most
remarkable about the adaptation is its steadfast reliability to Twain's text—not
one word has been changed. This very intelligent decision is akin to Kenneth
Brannaugh's Oscar nominated "adapted" screenplay of Shakespeare's
Hamlet, but where Brannaugh was working already within a dramatic medium,
Gelman exhibits a rare theatrical vision in moving from one narrative medium
to another without violating the original in the slightest. In other words,
rather than take a narrative and convert it to the conventions of theatrical
performance, Gelman decided to adapt theatrical performance to the demands
of the text: the three characters speak dialogue and all of the narration,
making the performance a kind of theatrical reading of Twain's work. That
doesn't mean that it's short on theatricality either. The space, a turn of
the century parlor functions as the set of a drawing room farce, and the production
augments the movements and language of the actors with some well chosen musical
accompaniment fitting the period and the moods of the piece. Josh Anderson
and Jessica Sanford-Hudspeth turn in very sensitive performances as Sally
and Aleck, whose imaginary speculations with an inheritance from a misanthropic
distant relative are the central action of the piece; and Joel Stanley Huff
(Tilbury) provides a lot of comic relief to and moral critique of the the
avaricious desires of the speculating couple. The performance shows how much
Twain's own concerns about the capitalism of his day prove to be cautionary
wisdom still.
One is tempted to wonder what might have resulted if Twain's own failed
attempts to adapt his work for the stage had taken Gelman's tack. I have no
idea if this would have worked for late-nineteenth and early twentieth-century
audiences, but it works very well for a twentieth-century audience, precisely
because it maintains the integrity of the original text. The result is a kind
of experimental theatre, but unlike so much experimental performance art that
is too enamored of its own devices, Gelman's "$30,000 Bequest" has
a reach fully aware of and entirely consistent with its grasp.
Gelman will become the aristic director of Chicago's Organic Theatre Company
next year, and hopes to mount a production of "$30,000 Bequest" that
may also tour some of the well appointed venues of the northern Illinois region,
so if you miss it this time, look for it again.